Security Services Domain Model / Component Layer

Component Layer

What you buy or build: products and solution artefacts that deliver the physical systems. (SABSA component layer.)

At A Glance

ConceptDefinition
ProductA tangible component — hardware appliance, software package, tool, standard or reference implementation — packaged by a vendor or built in-house to provide the technological foundation for executing security mechanisms.

This Layer, Live

The interactive model, pre-filtered to the component layer.

Open full screen

Select "All" to see how a product delivers the physical system it was chosen or built for.

Breaking Down The Concept

The concept below sets out what it is, exactly what an architect needs to do to select or build it well, the inputs it depends on, the outputs it must produce, and the mistake most likely to undermine it.

Product

What it is: a tangible component — a hardware appliance, software package, tool, standard or reference implementation — packaged by a vendor or developed in-house to provide the technological foundation for executing security mechanisms and sub-mechanisms, translating conceptual and logical designs into procurable solution artefacts.

What you need to do:

  1. Select or build the product only after the physical system, mechanism and sub-mechanism it needs to deliver are already defined. The product is the last link in the chain, not the first.
  2. Identify the product specifically — name, version, vendor — so its feature set, supported protocols and constraints are unambiguous.
  3. Confirm the product conforms to the industry standards, regulatory requirements and enterprise policy the domain has already set.
  4. Govern the product through its full lifecycle: procurement, deployment, patching, upgrade and retirement, not just the initial selection decision.
  5. Keep the product's interface specification, constraints and support agreements documented so the organisation isn't dependent on one person's memory of how it was chosen.

Inputs: the physical systems and mechanisms it must deliver, enterprise technology standards, vendor and market options.

Outputs: a procured or built product, governed through its lifecycle, delivering the physical systems the architecture specified.

Watch for: choosing the product first and reverse-engineering the logical and physical layers to justify it. This is exactly backwards, and it's how architecture becomes vendor-shaped instead of business-shaped.

Who, What, When, Where, Why

Who

Procurement, vendor management and engineering teams own product selection and lifecycle, working from physical systems and mechanisms security architecture has already specified. Security architecture stays involved to confirm the product genuinely satisfies what was specified, not just what the vendor's data sheet claims.

What

What you actually buy or build: the procurable solution artefact — hardware, software, tool, or reference implementation — that delivers the physical systems the architecture requires.

When

Selected last, once the physical system and mechanism it needs to deliver are already defined, and revisited at every lifecycle milestone: renewal, upgrade, end-of-life, or vendor change.

Where

Wherever procurement and vendor management sit in the organisation, governed against enterprise technology standards and the specific physical requirements the architecture has already set.

Why

Choosing the product last, against an already-specified physical requirement, is what keeps the organisation's architecture in charge of its technology choices instead of the other way around.

Cross-Framework Mapping

ConceptAlso Known As
ProductTechnology Product (TOGAF/ArchiMate), Configuration Item (ITIL/CMDB), Solution Enabler (COBIT), Information System Component (NIST SP 800-53).
← Physical Layer Next: Drivers, Risk & Value →